A website's price is determined by the effort involved and the compensation of the person conducting the job.
Three things to understand when developing a website
- The person who is providing the work.
- The person who is taking the work.
- The method of work of the person who is taking the job.
First, the reasons behind numbers 2 and 3
2The person who is taking the work
The higher the experience, the higher the salary, and the quality of an experienced person's work is very high. So no skilled person will ever want to do high quality work at low wages. If someone behaves that way, their experience is probably inadequate.
3The method of work of the person taking the job
The proper way is to first create a beautiful website design, then build the HTML from that design and complete the rest of the work with the help of that HTML.
But many people instead copy an old website, changing the images, logo, text and colours to create a new-looking website. The effort and the time are much less, but this method is not the correct one at all.
From the above analysis, it is clear how a website is created at a low cost.
- Is it something that everyone does?
- Why do individuals choose this incorrect approach?
The answer lies with number 1
1The person who is providing the work
The words used and the way the work is given by this person determine many things about the work. For example:
I don't have much time, I need a website very soon.
I have a very small budget for the project and have to make a website within that.
You claim that the price is quite high, however I found it elsewhere for a considerably lesser amount.
Words like these have a major impact on the task, and the developer completes the work using different approaches as a result.
A good, high-quality website is never possible for 3000 / 5000 rupees from any experienced person using the proper approach. A website can never run well for long if the quality is not good; then it either has to be rebuilt or closed. So these kinds of advertisements can be called nothing but fraud.
Comments